|
| |
|
MDV
Visitor Comments:
[ Back ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next ]
MDV Featured Article -
Visitor Comments of 2005. -
by Streetz
- posted 12/1/05 - discuss
here
|

Below you will
find several comments (both good and bad) sent in to Magic Deck Vortex
via email as well as a few comments here and there by the
webmaster. This is all for fun and reference as well as an
opportunity for me to share some important insights and points about
Magic Deck Vortex and the why's and how's of it's existence. If
you have a comment, suggestions, argument, rebuttal, or anything at
all about MDV, please email the webmaster:
streetz@magicdeckvortex.com.
Remember, if you don't want to see your comments posted on this page,
please add that in your email.
RE:
Nero's Bloody Vengeance, 7-6-05
nightmare
writes:
You and Beebles are on this
site in case you do not know.(Nero's Bloody Vengeance) I did not no
where else to send this?
9/4/05 John Streetz writes: You
sent it to the right place (magicdeckvortex(@)hotmail(dot)com). Good
job. And about Nero's Bloody Vengeance, yes I knew that too. Don't
forget that I scour the net several times each month for new sites,
interesting updated sites and portals (to see if they link to the
material on Magic Deck Vortex). Portals, for your information, are sites
that link to material on other sites on a daily basis. Nero's Bloody
Vengeance is just that, a Magic Portal.
I'll be honest, I get aggravated with
the majority of the portals (or sites like Nero's Bloody Vengeance).
Other portals include www.maroox.com,
www.magicthegatheringcards.net,
www.mtgtoday.com, and
www.blackborder.com. I get aggravated because while MDV
doesn't have new content EVERY DAY, I do have new content including
combos, deck database additions and articles that are posted several
times a week.. the majority of these portals don't ever link back to
Magic Deck Vortex. Perhaps their little content spiders get bored of
coming to MDV to only see new material 3 times a week, or maybe they
don't check out MDV at all anymore. Either way, I get upset when MDV,
a casual site, is not represented in their conglomeration of net
articles.
Take Maroox, for instance. I thought
I had a great relationship with them in the beginning of their
existence. They would link to almost every feature, article and blurb
I put up on MDV. Plus, MDV's deck building contests inspired their
own. However, as time progressed, they stopped linking to MDV articles
and features. Why? Because the person in charge of linking to all of
the site material changed and apparently they didn't like MDV or
whatever. Who
knows? I urged them to keep linking to MDV on many occassions and even offered them a
spot in my quick links section on the front page. Still nothing.
That's when I said to myself, screw it. I don't need their traffic. I
would like to think MDV would have enough dedicated viewers who spread
the word of MDV by mouth that I don't need a Portal to help out MDV
and let people know about MDV.
In the end, yes, I knew Nero's Portal
included links to MDV articles, decks and combos. Do they link to
everything on MDV that should be linked? No. That's why I don't visit
the site often anymore. All these portals care about are sites like
www.magicthegathering.com,
www.starcitygames.com and
www.londes.com and rarely do they actually branch out to lesser
sites like
www.magicdeckvortex.com and other casual sites out there. Perhaps
this will change, but I sincerely doubt it.
And, for the record, Nero's Portal is one of the
better ones. This was not a rant about Nero's website but more
all of the portals for MTG on the net. And there are more than I
referenced above.
[/end rant]
Thanks for your comments. ~Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
Error in banned/restricted list, 10-08-04
Nate Heiss
writes:
You have Skullclamp as
restricted in standard - it is
actually banned.
Nice site btw :)
9/4/05 John Streetz writes: While
this email was received A LONG TIME AGO, I just wanted to say how cool
it is to know high profile MTG players (and affiliates with Wizards)
like Nate are visiting Magic Deck Vortex. One of MDV's goals
(originally) was to get
www.magicthegathering.com to link to MDV in their content
somewhere. While I know that
will never happen because of the spoilers I post and the fictional
card set I have, I still would love to see the link.
Also, with regard to errors on the site, I HIGHLY
encourage you to email me if you see any type of error on ANY page.
Remember that I alone run this site. Yes, I do have writers and
from time to time, but I
make all of the changes, post all of the articles, make all of the
images for MDV, and so on. That's a lot of work for someone that works two
jobs and still enjoys an active social life.
And, Nate, thank you for compliment and for making
me aware of an
error! It was fixed accordingly shortly after I received your
email. ~Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
Primers on your site, 6-19-05
fan
writes:
Dear Sir, Great site! After
quitting magic for 5 years, I might start again. You used to have
a page for a listing of the primers for major type 1 decks, like the
weird "40% chance 1 turn kill" decks that casual players won't know how
to play even if they had the money to get those cards. They're really
interesting, but now when I type in www.magicdeckvortex.com/primers, it
says I don't have access to it. Did you cancel this feature or is
something else going on?
9/4/05 John Streetz writes: Thank
you! And, welcome back to the world of Magic: the Gathering.
With regard to the primers, I have posted them again. I posted a
blurb last week about it (found on the main DDB page). All of the
primers and the deck descriptions are in dire need of being updated
and if you or anyone has time and the effort to help MDV with this,
please let me know. Thanks for your comments. ~Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
updates?, 8-13-05
Yoni
writes:
hey, I just saw your new
updates like the archers and stuff, great job, are you going to do more
creatures in the near future?
p.s I don't mean to rush you, take your time
9/4/05 John Streetz writes: Simply
put, Yes. For the most part, all creature races and classes that
have more than five in their group have been posted. Even
Leeches have a page! Anyway, Ravnica
will boost up a few creature types such as Dragons, Elephants,
Shapeshifters, Plants, Wizards, Trolls, Insects, Viashino, Dryads and
Vedalken (to name a few). There may even be a few new ones.
Once I know what creatures will be in the set I will post a few new
Creature Spoilers and keep them updated as more come along. I am
rather excited that there are a few Sphinx, Shapeshifters, Plants and
Dryads in this set as I am always happy to add more to those lists (or
create a new one like Sphinx) and even more... create a TRIBAL deck
based around them! Thanks for writing in, Yoni. And P.S. -
I always take my time.. I only rush around during rumor
season. ~Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
9th Edition Spoiler, 7-7-05
JF
writes:
Hi MDV, thanks for posting
your visual spoiler to 9th ed. I just found your web site today and
appreciate the work !
Do you know where I can find a spoiler (or even just a checklist) of the
9th ed. cards with references to which card series they were reprinted
from.
Thanks, JF.
9/4/05 John Streetz writes: Perhaps
this is something I might do in the not so distant future, but in the
meantime, I can only refer you. The Gatherer utility on
www.magicthegathering.com
is a wonderful utility (most likely one of the best card search
utilities on the net) which can help you out. It can be found
here. Note: You can
sort your search results by card name, color, mana cost, card type,
power, toughness and rarity.
If you want a checklist for Ninth Edition CORE Set, go
here.
If you want to see what set each card is from for
Ninth Edition, click
here. Note that, in this link, all of the printings of the
card are listed in the right most column called 'printings'.
Hopefully this has helped you and any other visitor
with a similar question. Best of luck to you and thanks for
writing to MDV! ~Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
Green-Black All-Common Control, 6-16-05
Elliot
writes:
In the
Green-Black All-Common
Control deck that was recently posted, I was wondering why you chose
Craw Wurm over Yavimaya Wurm? They are both 6/4 wurms for 4GG, but the
Yavimaya Wurm also has trample and still counts as a common. I imagine
that using predator's strike with a Craw Wurm is a good reason for
having them instead, but I was wondering if you forgot about Yavimaya
Wurm.
9/4/05 John Streetz writes: Thanks
for the comments, Elliot. The reason: I didn't make the deck.
Chris Romeo, over on
www.starcitygames.com, did. As a reminder, many, many of the
decks on Magic Deck Vortex where taken from other sites like Star
City, MTG.com, londes.com, Casual Players, Boldo's Armory and so on.
The majority of the time I do not modify their decks. This is why you see the problems with the card choices you
mentioned above. Why did Chris choose Craw Wurm over Yavimaya
Wurm? That I don't know. Perhaps it was a format concern.
I don't believe Yavimaya Wurm was reprinted recently. Whatever
the reason, know that MDV's deck pages are not meant to be
copied and played. Instead, I encourage you to make the deck
your own and replace the cards you want with other ones. This
concept should be applied to every deck on the site. ~Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
Listing Error, 1/17/05
Holly Jennings
writes:
I am interested in building
the blessed aurators deck you
have listed under the combo section of your website, and while reading
the list encountered several problems. Firstly, under the "description
of deck" headline there is no description. Second, I don't see any
sideboard listed. 1'm not sure if the deck is supposed to have a
sideboard but I just thought I would mention it anyway. Aside from these
errors the deck looks great, along with the rest of your website which
is a godsend for magic fans like myself.
3/12/05 John Streetz writes:
For your use, I have pulled that inquest from my collection and added
the description of the deck including the paragraph about how to
sideboard. Most of the time, when I post a deck from Inquest, I
don't post the detail about it. Sometimes this is because I am
lazy, while other times it's because the description is geared towards
a 10 year old and doesn't offer any good information for the deck
except a bunch of tongue and cheek jokes about it. Anyway,
please enjoy. If you click on the link you will find all of the
information about this deck.
On a side note, I am looking for someone to go through
the deck database in their spare time and add descriptions for decks
and/or make notes about outdated or redundant decks. My spare time
just doesn't allow me to do this as much as I would like to.
Thanks! ~John Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
Star City Games, 2/5/05
clem
writes:
Amen to your article on Star
City going premium! I play MTG every Thursday with a group of friends.
And we're not a bunch of nerds either. We're all professionals with
significant others. We have a few beers and order some pizza. I enjoy
the game because it is an excellent game of strategy and because I love
its social aspects. I have ordered cards from Star City in the past, but
never again. The greed just turns me off! Thank you for you awesome
site. I just wanted to let you know you have fans who are as passionate
about the game as you are....for the right reasons.
3/12/05 John Streetz writes:
Amen, brother... to the magic, the pizza and most certainly the beer.
It's good to know I am not alone in the world.
Seriously though, I wasn't trying to
insinuate that if you stay on top of the tournament scene that you are a
nerd. I just wanted to make a point that I think it is terrible
that good sites have to go premium to stay afloat (or to put more money
in their pockets). The only good thing to come out of Star City's
changeover to PREMIUM is that Abe Sargent has been posting lots of
crazy, wacky, cool casual decks. And you don't need to have a
premium membership to view them. In fact, I found a great quote
from Abe in one of his
articles on Star City Games:
I remember once playing a multi-player game and I
pulled out a deck that had four maindeck Antiquities Energy Fluxes,
and no artifacts. I absolutely crushed the table, many of whom were
relying on artifacts to fix mana, draw cards, as creatures, and so
forth. The following week when we played, three of us were packing a
full set of Energy Fluxes.
And that is why I play Magic. In order that I might play a card and
have players closely scrutinize it - and then after reading it,
ask,"Where can I get some of those?"
Now that's a great quote (for me at
least). That's a concept I live by. Thanks, Clem, for your
comments! ~John Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
Site Comment, 12/24/04
Christian Charzewski
writes:
Hi, I just wanted to tell
you that I really love your site. The whole data is very valuable and I
spend many hours reading the combo and deck information.
One feature I wanted to ask you for: Is it possible to implement a
search engine, where you can for example type a card name and it's
checked for possible combos?3/12/05 John Streetz writes:
I
have gone over this in the past but let me re-iterate it.
Frontpage, the program I use to put the website together, has a built in
search function. However, I cannot get it to work because the host
I use does not have the latest server extensions to run the search and
it is a UNIX based server. With these two things in mind, it is
very difficult to have an in-site search module.
If anyone has any suggestions or expertise in
FrontPage and UNIX based servers, please let me know. I would love
to resolve this once and for all (for myself and you all of you).
I put this site together, but I most certainly cannot remember every
deck name, deck content, combo and feature I have done in the past
almost three years.
As for a temporary fix to the situation, you can
always go the GOOGLE. If you want to search only Magic Deck Vortex
for a deck using, say, Goblin Game, type in:
"Goblin Game" www.magicdeckvortex.com
It will list all of the pages on MDV (or most of them)
with that card referenced on it. For example, the above search I
used as an
example brings you one result:
Coin Chaos.
Nifty if you ask me. It works for my use.
Thanks for visiting MDV! ~John Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
spoilers, 12/4/04
S. Dioact
writes:
Hi. I've been playing magic
since 4th edition, & have known about your site for quite some time now.
I like the fact that you do spoilers to let people like me who haven't
seen every card to be able to know what they look like. I only as k "why
haven't you done the spoilers for Planeshift & Apocalypse"? I love the
invasion set, but since you haven't completed the set all the way
through, I don't know what cards I do or do not have. Please take this
into consideration.

3/12/05 John Streetz writes:
It takes me about an hour to post a visual spoiler for a past set and
that's assuming I already have most of the cards in my database of
card images. I will add to my 'list of things to do' to post
those two spoilers for you. In the meantime, I want to add
spoilers for the portal cards first since they will be legal in the
Eternal formats later this year and people will be hot to see them.
Until then.. you can always go
here to find those spoilers. They will not be as visual as
mine, but they should fulfill your needs to check your collection
against a list. Thanks for your comments. ~John Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
RE:
shamans, 2/13/05
TheVex
writes:
Your list of creatures with
shaman creature types doesn't include all the shamans. At the moment I
can only think of one that's missing (Troll Ascetic), but I'm pretty
sure there's more. A good idea would be to go to www.essentialmagic.com
and click on the advanced card search link. From there you can search
for cards by creature type.
3/12/05 John Streetz writes:
Thanks for the keen eye. I have since corrected the list.
As for your comments on essential magic.. I do not prefer to use
essential magic at all. I am not a big fan of sites that don't
provide a links section. Sure, they have a forum, a deck search
and other modules for you to use and they might be a great tool online
for Magic players. However, I would never use their services
because they won't link exchange with Magic Deck Vortex. If you
want a list of other sites that provide the same searching you can go to
the gatherer, MtgFanatic.com, cool stuff inc, and etc... ~John Streetz~
[RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE]
|
Find other articles by this author here.
Find other articles from this series here.
[ Back ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next ]
Articles
Spotlights from 2008:
MDV Visitor Comments from 2003 MDV Visitor Comments from 2004 MDV Visitor Comments from 2005 MDV Visitor Comments from 2006
|